Archive for the ‘Reviews’ Category

Review: The Wise Man’s Fear

Wednesday, April 13th, 2011
The Wise Man’s Fear is the second book of the Kingkiller Chronicles which Patrick Rothfuss introduced to the fantasy world with his debut novel The Name of the Wind. The Wise Man’s Fear picks up where the first novel left off, and I would strongly suggest that you start with the Name of the Windif you haven’t already, as some of the plot-lines carry over and it definitly does build on the foundation laid by the first book. That said, I also think it could stand pretty well on its own.The story is delivered through a frame narrative in which the main character, Kvothe, now a hero immortalized in story, tells the truth of his story to a travelling scribe. This narrative sets up the primary conceit of the story: that we get to hear the wild exaggerations of his exploits before we get to hear the actual–generally more down-to-earth reality of the tale. The weaving of levels of story is done with varying degrees of success.  The delivery of the exaggerated facts and the revelation of the truth is woven masterfully throughout the story, but the overarching frame story and the digressions of the narrator leads to some pacing issues as Kvothe glosses quickly over things that the reader might be interested in hearing about, and lingers long on things that the reader might not.The story itself contains many elements that will be familiar to any regular reader of fantasy novels. You have your wizard’s school, your absentminded but powerful master wizard, your mysterious powerful villainous force. But they are all tied together in delightful, and occasionally hilariously subversive ways. The novel delights in fantasy tropes and loves to turn them in unexpected ways.

The main character, Kvoth is well developed and motivated, though he does become an all-around polymath powerhouse of arcane and martial might through the course of the story. But what can you expect of a fantasy hero? Though Rothfuss does take the standard and play around with it, not only is Kvothe a cunning smooth-talker, a stealthy rooftop acrobat, a creative and powerful magician, a master swordsman, martial artist, and rising star in political machinations he is also  a world-class musician, composer, storyteller and the worlds best lover as well.

Which brings us to the larges problem this story has with pacing, Kvothe travels from place to place and spends long periods of time in different locations in-between. During one of these journeys he just abandons the plot (and his time-sensitive delivery of a massive quantity of gold)  to travel to a far away place to learn the ways of the force. . . I mean the Adema, but we don’t have Han Solo and Leia being captured in Cloud City to keep our interest as this is a first person single-viewpoint narrative (frame aside). Not that that section isn’t interesting, it just pulls us away from the expected flow of the narrative. The novel has several of these shifts in place and pace which can be a little jarring, but if you are willing to put up with some digressions and downtime, it all works out quite well in the end.

Review: The Way of Kings

Tuesday, March 8th, 2011

I have liked Brandon Sanderson since his first book was published, his detailed worlds, original magic systems, and the way he weaves his magic and character development so firmly into the world in fantastic stories. Mistborn is one of the best series I have read in recent times, Elantris was fantastic, and Warbreaker was wonderfully epic. I love the way he consistently turns the genre on its head. And now, after working on completing Robert Jordan’s (nothing if not genre conventional) Wheel of Time series, Sanderson turns in the first volume of his own vast world spanning fantasy epic.

And it is good.

His writing is crisp and clear, not overly flowery but it reads really smoothly. The language subtly reflects the character of the viewpoint characters as well as the world and culture of the story, most notably Sanderson manages to really capture the flavor in the passages he quotes from the titular fictional book “the Way of Kings”. The characters themselves are well rounded, motivated by subtle shades of their pasts and they act in real and surprising ways. They each have their own secrets, their own past and motivations as well as complex morals and personal struggles.The way that character back-story is woven into the main narrative is masterfully handled and finely paced, trickling out the details throughout the narrative so we learn their motivations for their present actions just as they become necessary, in whole it makes the characters exceptionally deep and engaging.

The structure of the novel itself is somewhat original in that it is broken up into discrete sections called “books” with each “book” dedicated to the stories of 2-4 of the 4 primary viewpoint characters which are themselves participating in three separate story arcs that take place in different locations and slowly connect into a masterfully epic plot. Between each of these “books” are Interludes, consisting of character vignettes that take place in other parts of the world, with other characters, one of which runs parallel to the main story and builds in a way that makes it clearly part of the overarching plot of the series that this book establishes. Each of these little vignettes gives details to some part of the world, or other characters, or the overarching plot. Despite the number of viewpoint characters and the distance of the interludes to the main story, unlike many other epic fantasy works I have read that had different viewpoint characters (such as Wheel of Time) this book managed to balance the viewpoints and make each character engaging enough that I did not ever feel frustrated by the viewpoint switch.

The world itself and the magic is original while at the same time playing with some recognizable tropes. Yes we are in a medieval-ish society (with access to relics of long lost magic) that is organized into a feudal system, but the world itself has been shaped by the Highstorms, magically powerful storms that sweep across the land, and the detail of the adaptations of the world, and society to these storms is just fascinating. Every detail seems to have been thought out, from the political system, the history, the storms, the magic and how it all comes together. The magic actually has a cost (in stormlight, or gemstones infused with stormlight as the case may be) and the economic implications of practical gemstones is even taken into consideration, emeralds become the most valuable because they can be used to transmute stone into organic material and even food, and this makes is easy for a well funded army to travel far beyond their supply lines. Everything comes together in the story.

While the novel balances viewpoints, character backgrounds, and world-building it is at the same time playing out scenes of well paced action alongside deep character interactions, secretive political intrigues, and some startlingly deep philosophical discussions. This is not only an epic tale, but it also serves as a practical exploration of leadership; discussing the use of law and order, morality of justice, and what right men have to lead others. And it isn’t just a surface discussion, it raises some very deep points.

All together it is a massive, detailed and well-written work that comes together in an climax. And even at 1000 pages and a self-sufficient story in its own right it feels like it is a wonderful epic prologue setting up an even wider story, and it left me wanting the rest. The Way of Kings reminds me of the Wheel of Time in some ways, but it is certainly better then any individual work of that series, more finely crafted, more original and more insightful. It also made me think at times of Dune, and I found that it compared favorably even there, the character development was more personal, and the scope even larger.

The one concern I have stems from the revelation that the “almighty creator” was just a fallible man and the hints of dualism underpinning the cosmology. But I can’t fully judge the cosmology until it has been more fully revealed.

Review: Stargate Universe

Wednesday, September 15th, 2010

I’ve always wanted to do reviews of stories on this blog, but I never got around to it, either because I was so behind anyone else’s reviews or because I didn’t think anyone would read it.

I still don’t really expect anyone to read it, particularly since I haven’t posted here for a while. And I am still behind everyone else, but give me a break, I don’t have the money to get new stuff, so I am stuck reviewing what I watch.

I’ve been something of a fan of the Stargate series of TV shows ever since I found the 3rd season of Stargate SG-1 for $20 bucks at a used video and music store some 6 or so years ago. That was about the point that I realized that used television series were a much better deal in a money-to-time-entertained ratio and started to cultivate an understanding of the genre–by which I mean watching a lot of television. What I liked about Stargate SG-1 was that it didn’t really take itself seriously, it had engaging characters with entertaining quirks and lots of witty one-liners. It was entertaining, light science fiction fun. Not particularly great story, not all that deep, but fun. I managed to collect all 10 seasons on DVD (mostly for quite reasonable prices). Stargate Atlantis followed in much the same vein, if possibly taking itself more seriously and re-using tropes from the SG-1, but I still enjoyed it and watched it all.

So one would think that when Stargate Universe came out I would have been all over it. But it was in the middle of a busy time in my last semester and after initially watching part of the first episode of I put the show down as an attempt to imitate Battlestar Galactica (the new one) without actually having the depth and quality that made Battlestar Galactica transcendently awesome (I admit to being a bit of a BSG fanboy). So I belittled it and didn’t watch it.

Well, I recently revisited the show and I have changed my opinion. It is indeed trying to be   Battlestar Galactica, but it looks like it could actually be pretty good. It doesn’t have the same sense of fun that Stargate SG-1 has, and it doesn’t have the depth and quality that BSG has, but it does have a pretty good sense of tension and from the first 3 episodes looks like it could have deeper and more motivated characters than the other Stargates though I am a little concerned that the lack of cohesive cinematographic direction and the attempt to force character depth may cause the show to fall apart as it continues.

The characterization was somewhat heavy-handed in the first episode, there isn’t much nuance to the characters and acting at the beginning, which is usually to be expected. The writers managed to force (somewhat over-wrought) back-stories for the main characters into the narrative, which showed an attempt to get at the more realistic complicated characters that made BSG so good, but wasn’t executed quite as well in the first episodes at least.

The camera knew that it was trying to have odd angles and be shaky at times like Battlestar Galactica but it didn’t seem to know why and broke the documentary style quite frequently, and even when it did keep the documentary hand-camera style it often placed itself in places that people could not logically be, such as behind staircases, around corners and on cliff-faces above the action. In conventional cinema generally you want to keep viewers from thinking about the camera (though the trend nowadays has been to break that) BSG uses the camera to film the unreal (the spaceships and robots and space drama) as if there was actually someone there filming them, drawing attention to the camera and making it feel more real. Stargate Universe uses the camera to frame shots you generally wouldn’t think about, and call attention to the camera. . . and make it feel like they are trying to be BSG (or that there is a camera crew hiding on the spaceship filming the crew as some kind of prank reality TV setup).

The writing wasn’t bad. And I love the premise of getting stranded on a huge spaceship that you can’t control. While the pilot wasn’t enough to show me that this is an awesome show, it at least gave me hope that it could go in an interesting direction. I don’t know if it is going to be any good (particularly since I just spent most of this review pointing out its flaws). But I’m going to see where it goes.


Copyright © 2012 No More Than Pen and Ink. All Rights Reserved.
No computers were harmed in the 0.365 seconds it took to produce this page.

Designed/Developed by Lloyd Armbrust & hot, fresh, coffee.

 

Switch to our mobile site